I am dealing with a large piece.
Especially in these times of crisis when capitalism gets a face full mouth.
Yeah, we are in a crisis of ultra-liberalism, money-king has gone mad and we rushed into the wall!
Capitalism which simply raise, raise, A-MA-NESS money without caring about others, we threw in this dramatic situation.
We knew! It is clear, the doctrine of egoism is anti-social how the tribe France could survive!
I will do in the provocative.
" Those who advocate laissez-faire capitalism are the only defenders of human rights .
This quote from Ayn Rand what has shocked many in our beloved country.
She explains that capitalism and its defense are the only means of ensuring the rights of man.
Defending capitalism is not defending a system that ensures the prosperity of a country and the creation of wealth. Not defend capitalism is to defend moral values and ethical.
Ensuring the existence of capitalism is ensured respect and dignity of every human being.
It's provocative final!
definition of capitalism in Lexilogos : " economic system characterized by the concentration of big money to promote production and trade .
or
" economic and social system characterized by private ownership of means of production and exchange and the profit motive " .
In Larousse.fr " production system whose foundations are private enterprise and free market .
or
" Legal status of a human society characterized by private ownership of means of production and their implementation by workers who do not own "
There is mention of 'no moral justification the existence of capitalism.
It speaks of a production system, a system based on private ownership and free trade.
Ayn Rand complained that the lack of moral or ethical justification for the existence of capitalism disarm its supporters. The latter did not justify the need of capitalism as its ability to create more wealth for everyone, despite social inequalities. It is the least worst system. Until you have found something better, it is used.
ladies and gentlemen I'll also try (taking Ayn Rand ) provide a justification corporate capitalism.
In fact I will show that applying the strict sense of moral rules automatically involving capitalism.
Be simple. Let
from the beginning.
bases of morality is part of the ten commandments.
Thou shalt not kill.
Thou shalt not steal. It
respect others.
Killing is wrong, we know (and can explain it objectively).
Theft is stealing the property of others, he can not dispose as he wishes.
A slave is someone who does not enjoy the fruits of his labor. The fruit This work is at the disposal of his master. It's like flying.
When you are flying or when you are the slave of others, you are subject to coercion so you're more free.
This ties the definition of freedom, that of John Locke " natural liberty of man consists in being subject to any power on earth [...] , not to be subject to the domination of any will "
Being free is not to be subjected or enslaved.
is very concrete, and do not steal from others is what we call respect private property rights. It means respecting the individual existing on earth.
In everyday life we do not fit the way you want the neighbor is not using his TV or a washing machine or dishwasher without permission. If we did, the other no longer exist in a sense. If I take his car when he needs it, it wiped out his plans, his desires, his desires. A part of him, that defines him as unique individual, is destroyed.
For another really exists on earth, we respect his private property. Today in our societies, we respect this rule, we do not steal others is imperative that we give ourselves (though we do it through the state) .
Observe that before exterminating the Jews, the Nazis seized their property, alongside the Communists in Poland have expropriated the country's elite before the run Katyn. When we violate the property rights of others we already have a foot on the field running.
Respect the right of private property is not stolen. But then how to get the fruit of the work of others except by force?
It's simple, for free trade. Voluntary cooperation. Free trade. Either I give my property or I exchange against another property (or money).
Note that while not killing or stealing point point, we respect the right of private property and free trade.
In the definitions given above capitalism seeks to respect the right of private property, free trade and free trade.
Follow these principles lead to better de facto capitalist system. Economy of free trade.
But Ayn Rand he added a word, the Laissez-faire. In fact we talk about different types of capitalism, the state, mixed type, etc. ... It speaks of a capitalism which no individual is subjected to stress, where the right to life and its corollary Law on land of private property is inviolable absolute.
Besides capitalism Laissez-faire is a redundant phrase, because if we refer to the definitions (very imperfect incidentally), capitalism is intrinsically linked to the rights of private property so to respect the individual. Other forms of capitalism are as perverted forms of mixing freedom and coercion (like ours).
And Bastiat said, "It is two principles that can not be reconciled: Freedom and Constraint" .
Actually, my title is misleading, there is no particular ethical capitalism that is inconsistent with other ethical issues.
Capitalism is the consequence of the universal ethic, one of Human Rights.
Especially in these times of crisis when capitalism gets a face full mouth.
Yeah, we are in a crisis of ultra-liberalism, money-king has gone mad and we rushed into the wall!
Capitalism which simply raise, raise, A-MA-NESS money without caring about others, we threw in this dramatic situation.
We knew! It is clear, the doctrine of egoism is anti-social how the tribe France could survive!
I will do in the provocative.
" Those who advocate laissez-faire capitalism are the only defenders of human rights .
This quote from Ayn Rand what has shocked many in our beloved country.
She explains that capitalism and its defense are the only means of ensuring the rights of man.
Defending capitalism is not defending a system that ensures the prosperity of a country and the creation of wealth. Not defend capitalism is to defend moral values and ethical.
Ensuring the existence of capitalism is ensured respect and dignity of every human being.
It's provocative final!
definition of capitalism in Lexilogos : " economic system characterized by the concentration of big money to promote production and trade .
or
" economic and social system characterized by private ownership of means of production and exchange and the profit motive " .
In Larousse.fr " production system whose foundations are private enterprise and free market .
or
" Legal status of a human society characterized by private ownership of means of production and their implementation by workers who do not own "
There is mention of 'no moral justification the existence of capitalism.
It speaks of a production system, a system based on private ownership and free trade.
Ayn Rand complained that the lack of moral or ethical justification for the existence of capitalism disarm its supporters. The latter did not justify the need of capitalism as its ability to create more wealth for everyone, despite social inequalities. It is the least worst system. Until you have found something better, it is used.
ladies and gentlemen I'll also try (taking Ayn Rand ) provide a justification corporate capitalism.
In fact I will show that applying the strict sense of moral rules automatically involving capitalism.
Be simple. Let
from the beginning.
bases of morality is part of the ten commandments.
Thou shalt not kill.
Thou shalt not steal. It
respect others.
Killing is wrong, we know (and can explain it objectively).
Theft is stealing the property of others, he can not dispose as he wishes.
A slave is someone who does not enjoy the fruits of his labor. The fruit This work is at the disposal of his master. It's like flying.
When you are flying or when you are the slave of others, you are subject to coercion so you're more free.
This ties the definition of freedom, that of John Locke " natural liberty of man consists in being subject to any power on earth [...] , not to be subject to the domination of any will "
Being free is not to be subjected or enslaved.
is very concrete, and do not steal from others is what we call respect private property rights. It means respecting the individual existing on earth.
In everyday life we do not fit the way you want the neighbor is not using his TV or a washing machine or dishwasher without permission. If we did, the other no longer exist in a sense. If I take his car when he needs it, it wiped out his plans, his desires, his desires. A part of him, that defines him as unique individual, is destroyed.
For another really exists on earth, we respect his private property. Today in our societies, we respect this rule, we do not steal others is imperative that we give ourselves (though we do it through the state) .
Observe that before exterminating the Jews, the Nazis seized their property, alongside the Communists in Poland have expropriated the country's elite before the run Katyn. When we violate the property rights of others we already have a foot on the field running.
Respect the right of private property is not stolen. But then how to get the fruit of the work of others except by force?
It's simple, for free trade. Voluntary cooperation. Free trade. Either I give my property or I exchange against another property (or money).
Note that while not killing or stealing point point, we respect the right of private property and free trade.
In the definitions given above capitalism seeks to respect the right of private property, free trade and free trade.
Follow these principles lead to better de facto capitalist system. Economy of free trade.
But Ayn Rand he added a word, the Laissez-faire. In fact we talk about different types of capitalism, the state, mixed type, etc. ... It speaks of a capitalism which no individual is subjected to stress, where the right to life and its corollary Law on land of private property is inviolable absolute.
Besides capitalism Laissez-faire is a redundant phrase, because if we refer to the definitions (very imperfect incidentally), capitalism is intrinsically linked to the rights of private property so to respect the individual. Other forms of capitalism are as perverted forms of mixing freedom and coercion (like ours).
And Bastiat said, "It is two principles that can not be reconciled: Freedom and Constraint" .
Actually, my title is misleading, there is no particular ethical capitalism that is inconsistent with other ethical issues.
Capitalism is the consequence of the universal ethic, one of Human Rights.
0 comments:
Post a Comment